Would Malaysians accept a sodomiser as the Prime Minister?

Anwar Ibrahim had not denied that he had visited a condominium of his former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, who is accusing him of sodomy.

This was reported in the English version of the Harakahdaily dated 3rd July 2008 in an article titled "I never said I was never there, says Anwar".

He also declined to elaborate further by giving the pathetic excuse of, "You see anything I say now will be used (against me)," and "I'll wait for their investigation.. let them ask me," adding "there is nothing to worry".

There's an English proverb that says, "Silence gives consent". Does that mean that Anwar Ibrahim is agreeing with the sodomy allegation because he is keeping his mouth shut about the latest controversy?

And why is he so afraid to take the swear of the oath by the Quran (Mubahalah)? An innocent person conspired by the government will surely jumped at the chance to swear by the Quran.

Does this mean that Anwar Ibrahim is afraid of the consequences that might follow if he did swear by the Quran that he was not involved in the homosexual activities when in fact which is known by him and Allah, that he really did indulge in homosexual acts?

And the Pakatan Rakyat meaning Pas and DAP is being mum about their real stand on this issue but seriously both leaders from both parties knew about the true morality of Anwar Ibrahim.

And why would PAS and PKR be quiet on whatever actions taken by DAP even though it means that their actions will make the Malays lose out in the long run?

So what kind of struggle are PAS and PKR really fighting for, surely not to care for the Malays rights if they would even ignore the success of DEB in eradicating poverty amongst the Malays?

Of two evils choose the lesser and the people have now to accept the consequences for voting for the opposition which has no track record whatsoever in administering a state, moreover the federal level.